Recent content by Claude Simon

Well, Hi RDekker, My knowledges in asp trhought webspeed via wsasp.dll are too weak at the time, but do you think it's because of this web languaging bridge or because of the way you program ? I have personnally a doubt on the use of the get-value function but I'm not sure. Keep talking,

I'll wait for W++. Cheers.

I'm don't remember because there is more than year I don't touch webspeed coding now, but it seems to my mind, yes. Whatever, generate a new cgi-wrapper procedure, and compare, and if there is a set-cookie procedure in your output-headers, it will prove that is the good way of programming.

Hi Aviovda, Well, if I understood, you need to test the existence of distant files to aliment select-box, isn't ? Effectively, if it's the case, javascript testing should be sufficient. See the empty response (I suppose it's "?" or other) and exclude it. Whatever, I'm not an expert of...

So, if I well understand, in your application, cgi-wrapper and escript boosted, you can choose between HTML, XHTML or XML-XSL technology. If you don't want to choose, then you will choose after time, isn't ? I've got for a long be questionned why Progress was preferring to separate cleanly...

My advice is that before, create a buckle, after I could wish you another solution. Or maybe, post us logs from the broker where your procedure is executed. So, we could raise number errors.

Of course for treatment around html widget, speedscript is really interesting, instead of encapsulating cgi-wrappers tag in javascript function. Question : did you use speedscript for a big commercial application for instance ?

So, it should work.

It's strange to hard code the number of your cookie. You have to put a counter on it. This will be better.

Progress is really against use of Speedscript, they don't want to go in this way if I remember. So, it's not a professional way to program, and there should be not a lot of support on it. Whatever, I didn't never use it so I can't help you.

Hi Raj, Well, I'm here to verify your architecture. My question is : Do you have a webspeed server-firewall server- public network - html server - public network - chain ? or : webspeed server - html server - public network chain ? Whatever, Progress prohibes firewalls or too much distant...

Well, you have to create or pirat a procedure of sockets, of demand and response http-sockets. Unfortunately, I didn't conserve my code. Well, if it is not a html server, but an unix server, administrator of this server has to create you a batch program, who will deliver you the file between...

Obviously, our topic opener doesn't use speedscript, and it is a best way to program. Well, you have in your webspeed generated program, two procedures or function, it depends how you want to declare at posteriori, something like http-get and http-post. Get Method is the treatment at the entry...

Hi JDaniel052, well I suppose the message you get is the webspeed html log you get at the top of a webpage. Can you paste this message on this topic ? Is it a troubleshoot of persistence ? Is it a conflict in this cookie ? Do you try to re-write it before suppress it ? Hope it will work widely.

Hi all, Can you describe in which conditions is located your file ? Is it located on a different server, sowhere on the web, do you need to pass through different IP adresses ? If, it is the case, you'll need to use http sockets, administrators of the distant server should open an security...