grunnpi
New Member
Hello there,
My compagny is currently under 10.1b OpenEdge platform.
As 10.1b is retired, high management accept to move forward... but still need our arguments to validate upgrading.
What I see :
- .net GUi > but front evolution is not priority, and much less within technological change
- .class are now more evolved > nearly not used (yet)
- prerequisite for most latest OE tools (OpenEdge Management, for monitoring purpose) > good argument for management
- OE Architect > change IT tool, why not.. and what do we earn ?
What do you think else ?
Thanks for helping
My compagny is currently under 10.1b OpenEdge platform.
As 10.1b is retired, high management accept to move forward... but still need our arguments to validate upgrading.
What I see :
- .net GUi > but front evolution is not priority, and much less within technological change
- .class are now more evolved > nearly not used (yet)
- prerequisite for most latest OE tools (OpenEdge Management, for monitoring purpose) > good argument for management
- OE Architect > change IT tool, why not.. and what do we earn ?
What do you think else ?
Thanks for helping