Search results

  1. C

    Comment A Progress review

    It's very rare to find (if any) a Progress Openedge review. Yes, there are some flaws but it's interesting to find a review about the products we use. The first time i was in front of Provision (knowing anything about Progress) I didn't know where to start, so for someone who (apparently) starts...
  2. C

    user login error: Error reading socket, ret=0, errno=0.(778)

    It's a Windows platform. I've been analyzing the logs in the progress and windows side but don't see anything strange. I doubt it's a hardware network problem. The error message appears in some specific programs. I identified the programs and lines of code (hard work, because the error only...
  3. C

    user login error: Error reading socket, ret=0, errno=0.(778)

    We have the "Error reading socket 778 ..." since August 2011 with 9.1D. It's really frustating because the KB talks about a TCP/IP communication problem and there is no workaround. We have it since we introduced Windows 7 machines, before that we have no problem in almost 10 years with our...
  4. C

    Some ideas

    I work with Ezequiel and I understand his point of view: we're not leaving Progress, we like Progress since we bought it 10 years ago, long live Progress. He is trying to express his wishes to expand the use of Progress, but as Tamhas said 'is a niche product'. We live in Perú and very few...
  5. C

    Anybody knows WinDev?

    As I said a post earlier, we have Progress 9.1D and 10 years of applications. We cannot give up to them. Allard, thanks for your answer and your opinions. I have some additional questions: - -Did you have Progress RDBMS and migrate to WinDev and HyperFileSQL? - -Do you have...
  6. C

    Anybody knows WinDev?

    We are actually using Workgroup 9.1D with 24 users in a Windows environment and developing with Provision’s AppBuilder. We are very happy with the Database, in 10 years 0 problems. But now, we need something ‘new’ (maybe OpenEdge 10, maybe WinDev, maybe an ERP, maybe another database) because...
Top